Opinions
Opinions articles are one of the only instances in journalistic writing where I can include my personal opinion, which really allows me to use my journalistic voice and discuss issues that I care about. Below are two opinions articles, one published in my senior year and the other as a freshman.
Adding Up the Unnecessary Costs of College Applications
Comparing the prices of different College Board expenses.
Graphic by Lena Hardisty
When applying to college, I stumbled upon a scam, one that I felt needed to be written about. As I conducted more research, I realized that there was not just one scam, but a variety of different unfair elements to the college application process.
After many months of writing essays, asking for letters of recommendation and awaiting deadlines, like most other high school seniors, I have finally finished applying to college. But while this educational milestone is certainly worth celebrating, looking back on my experience, I realize that I have been effectively and thoroughly scammed.
That’s right. Scammed. Or however you might define the College Board’s manipulation of anxious high school seniors to earn a sizable profit.
Allow me to explain: most schools that are not “test-blind” allow students to self-report their SAT scores in their initial application, and then require an official score report sent through the College Board if students are eventually admitted. A select few schools, however, require an official score report along with the initial application, but they do not advertise this policy on their admissions website or on the Common App.
Why is this an issue? Shortly after submitting an application to a college, I received an email telling me that they required my SAT scores to come directly from the official testing agency, and that I had four days to send an official report or my scores would not be considered.
A standard College Board score report, which for some reason takes about two to six weeks to send, costs $12, an already egregious amount to pay for simply emailing a PDF document.
But I did not have two to six weeks, I had four days. So I was forced to purchase a rush order, which costs an additional $31, bringing my total to $43. Like I said, I was scammed.
My theory is that the College Board is colluding with the college I applied to, as well as other schools that require official test score reports. If these colleges do not clearly mention that they need a score report with the initial application, then more and more students are faced with my conundrum— and the College Board receives countless $43 payments.
The college I applied to also happens to be experiencing a financial crisis, and has been forced to make budget cuts and renegotiate various faculty contracts. I speculate that the College Board is paying said college to lessen their economic dilemmas in return for requiring official score reports with the initial application.
I wish this circumstance was the only instance of the College Board’s deceit during the college application process, but unfortunately it is not.
To take these SAT or ACT tests that I paid to send to a college, students must pay $52 to the College Board with an additional $16 to complete the essay portion.
Many students like me also take a variety of AP classes in their junior and senior years, which offer optional AP Exams at the end of the year. The College Board administers these tests, and with no late fees, students have to pay $125 for each exam.
A high AP score can potentially waive a college course, which costs significantly more than $125. However, most students do not know which college they will attend when they sign up for AP tests, and some schools either only accept certain scores or do not accept them all together.
And of course, just like sending SAT scores to colleges costs money, students must also pay an additional fee to submit their AP scores.
The College Board advertises that sending AP scores is completely free … except they are only free until June 20, and after this date standard scores cost $15, the rushed scores $25. The College Board typically releases AP scores in mid-July, which forces students who want to send their senior-year scores to pay extra.
Let’s say a hypothetical student applies to two colleges who covertly require official SAT score reports, takes the SAT twice (with the essay, of course), takes three AP tests in both their junior and senior years and needs to pay the rushed fee to send their AP scores. This student would pay the College Board a grand total of $997.
Attending a university after high school is already a costly investment for seniors, with application fees, transcript-sending expenses and of course, college tuition. Spending close to $1000 on unnecessary College Board payments is nonsensical and unfair, especially for those who are at a financial disadvantage.
While there are various fee waivers available throughout the college application process, many students who do not qualify for one might decide to apply to fewer colleges or not take standardized tests simply because they cannot afford the College Board’s inequitable prices.
I am excited to attend college next year. But like most other high school seniors, I will have spent too much money getting there.
Are the Seahawks Secretly Good?
This piece is one of the first articles I ever wrote. And while my writing style has significantly evolved since Nov. 20, 2018 (the day this article was published), I am still proud of my research and dedication to proving that the Seahawks, despite popular opinion, were not a bad team at the time.
Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson hands off the football to Marshawn Lynch.
Photo Courtesy Phillip Robertson
In September, five experienced NFL Network analysts created a series of videos predicting every National Football League team’s record. The group was very skeptical about the Seattle Seahawks’ potential in 2018.
​
All five analysts speculated that the Seahawks would perform very poorly, and three of them agreed that the team would at best produce a 5-11 record. A football team only five years removed from a Super Bowl now projected to only win five games for the entire season? I believe that these analysts were wildly wrong in their predictions. And I can prove it.
​
The Seahawks currently sit at a mediocre 5-5 record, which doesn’t exactly scream “elite football team.” Their statistics don’t appeal at first glance either. Out of 32 teams, on offense they rank 14th in points per game and 20th in yards per game. On defense, they rank 8th in points allowed and 11th in yards allowed.
​
On the surface the Seahawks have met their expectations. However, looking into the NFL archives proves that the numbers deceive. I took the statistics from this season so far and compared them with the first ten games from the 2013 Seahawks, the team that won the Super Bowl. The results were very interesting.
​
Believe it or not, the Seahawks are statistically a better team than they were in 2013. While the Seahawks are a lot younger and inexperienced now, they have produced better numbers.
​
For starters, quarterback Russell Wilson is playing better. This year he has thrown for almost 200 more yards than in 2013 up to this point, which is impressive given that the Seahawks pass on only 49 percent of their plays, the lowest in the league. Wilson has also majorly improved his touchdown-to-interception ratio from 17-6 to 23-5.
​
The current running game, absent powerhouse back Marshawn Lynch, has also been terrific. The Seahawks committee backfield, consisting of Chris Carson, Mike Davis and rookie Rashaad Penny, has produced 1252 rushing yards, compared to Lynch and Robert Turbin’s moderate 1025 yards in 2013.
​
With the addition of Wilson’s substantial amount of rushing yards, the Seahawks lead the entire NFL in rushing yards, a feat that the 2013 Seahawks did not achieve.
​
Seahawk receiving corps also have put up notable performances. The talented trio of wide receivers in Tyler Lockett, Doug Baldwin and David Moore continues to impress. They might remind some of the Tate-Baldwin-Kearse trio that vexed defensive backs five years ago.
​
While the offense hasn’t been that much of a problem, most critiques of the Seahawks focus on the young, rebuilt defense. The team said goodbye to many big-name defensive players this offseason such as Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor and Michael Bennett. They also lost safety Earl Thomas to a leg injury.
​
The Seahawks have started to rebuild by surrounding Pro Bowl linebackers Bobby Wagner and K.J. Wright with a plethora of rookies and second-year players.
​
The new Seahawks defense wasn’t expected to keep up with the pre-existing Legion of Boom, but the youngsters have proved critics wrong. Defensive linemen Frank Clark and Jarran Reed have combined for an impressive total of 15.5 sacks so far, while safety Bradley McDougald currently is second for the team with 44 tackles, with an additional two interceptions.
​
The cornerback position has been taken over by promising second-year player Shaquill Griffin and rookie Tre Flowers. Both have proved themselves as worthy opponents to receivers in coverage. Griffin has tallied a pair of interceptions, which is not bad for an inexperienced defense.
​
The Seahawks have improved on both sides of the ball since 2013, but the question still remains. If the team is doing better than when they won the Super Bowl, does that mean they have a chance for the big game again?
​
Since the team currently has a .500 record, it is going to be difficult. However, the playoffs are not yet out of reach.
​
“I think we can turn this around, we have a tough schedule. It’s going to show what we’re made of,” Wagner said during a press conference.
​
Winning the next two games against the Panthers and the Vikings would give the Seahawks a huge advantage in the wild card race. While the playoffs remain in question, one thing I can say is this: the Seahawks are not going to finish the season 5-11.